maritime directory | maritime registry | maritime companies | maritime managers | maritime operators | maritime charterers | maritime builders | maritime repairs | maritime finance | maritime insurance | maritime equipment | maritime owners | maritime brokers
maritime charterers chartering directory companies, Belgium maritime charterers chartering directory companies, Canada maritime charterers chartering directory companies, Channel Islands maritime charterers chartering directory companies, China maritime charterers chartering directory companies, Cyprus maritime charterers chartering directory companies, Czech Republic maritime charterers chartering directory companies, Denmark maritime charterers chartering directory companies, Estonia maritime charterers chartering directory companies, Finland maritime charterers chartering directory companies, France maritime charterers chartering directory One 1960 Ford Station Wagon Serial No.
Oc66W145329, “Although, presumably for purposes of obtaining jurisdiction, action for forfeiture under
Internal Revenue Laws is commenced as Proceeding in Admiralty, after jurisdiction is
obtained proceeding takes on character of civil action at law, and at least at such stage of
proceedings, Rules of Civil Procedure control.”
3. The Petitioners refer the court to 1 Benedict [6th Edition] §17, p. 28: which reads in pertinent part: “As no other than a court of admiralty can enforce maritime liens, no other court can displace,
discharge or subordinate them. Neither the State courts nor the United States courts on their
common law, equity and bankruptcy sides can divest, transfer to proceeds or adjudicate the maritime
liens unless the maritime lienor voluntarily submit themselves to the jurisdiction. Emphasis
added.
4. Pursuant to 28 USC § 2463 :All property taken or detained under any revenue law of the Unitedcompanies,
Germany maritime charterers chartering directory companies, Greece maritime charterers chartering directory companies, Highlands maritime charterers chartering directory companies, Holland maritime charterers chartering directory companies, Hong Kong maritime charterers chartering directory companies, Hungary maritime charterers chartering directory companies, Iceland maritime charterers chartering directory companies, Ireland maritime charterers chartering directory companies, Islands of Scotland maritime charterers chartering directory companies, Isle of Man maritime charterers chartering directory companies, Isle of Wight maritime charterers chartering directory companies, Italy maritime charterers chartering directory companies, Latvia maritime charterers chartering directory companies, Liechtenstein maritime charterers chartering directory companies, . hey may be entitled to receive.
Respectfully,
1. The District Court of the United States is the proper venue and has jurisdiction to hear this libel of
review. This is a proceeding in ADMIRALTY. “In this country, revenue causes had so long been the subject of admiralty cognizance, that
congress considered them as CIVIL CAUSES OF ADMIRALTY AND MARITIME
JURISDICTION, and to preclude and doubt that might arise, carefully added the
clause,”including,” etc. This is clear proof that congress considered these words to be used in
the sense they bore in this country and not in that which they had in England. The Act gives
exclusive admiralty and maritime jurisdiction to the district court. As a court of the law of a
nations, . . .”
THE HUNTRESS, 12 Fed. Case 984 @ 992 & 989, (Case No. 6,914)(D.Me. 1840):
2. As further evidence that the action before the court is in fact an Admiralty action we find i United
States of America v. $3,976.62 In currency,
Lithuania maritime charterers chartering directory companies, Luxembourg maritime charterers chartering directory companies, Malta maritime charterers chartering directory companies, New Zealand maritime charterers f upon its findings and conclusions, pursuant to Law, Justice and Fact, it is found
that Petitioner’s/Claimant’s claims are well founded, then in the interest of Law and Justice: that, (1)
The court Notify Respondents/Libelants et.al., to return all properties (monies) taken from
Petitioner’s/Claimant’s fiduciaries, as was taken from funds deposited in trust during bankruptcy case
# and the like; (2) Remove all Notices of Liens on record; or (3) The Respondents/Libelants
et.al., refuse such notice by the court, that Petitioner’s/Claimant’s, Libel of Review, Complaint et.al.,
be filed, Admiralty process issue, and that Respondents/Libelants et.al., be cited to appear and answer
the allegations of this libel; that said suit shall be reviewed, in the original, in the alternative, that said
alleged liens be removed and levies dismissed along with the return of all property of
Petitioners/Claimants; and that Petitioners/Claimants, (husband and wife) may have such other further
relief as tchartering directory companies, Northern Ireland maritime charterers chartering directory companies, Norway maritime charterers chartering directory companies, Philippines maritime charterers chartering directory companies, Poland maritime
chartering directory companies, Portugal maritime charterers chartering directory companies, Russia maritime charterers chartering directory companies, Scilly Isles maritime charterers chartering directory companies, Singapore maritime charterers chartering directory companies, Slovakia maritime charterers chartering directory companies, South Korea maritime charterers chartering directory companies, Spain maritime charterers12. The Petitioners/Claimants affirm and declare based upon information, knowledge and belief
that the above is true and correct. All and singular in the premises are true and within the
admiralty and maritime venue and jurisdiction of this Honorable Court.
CONCLUSION PRAYER AND RELIEF
Wherefore Petitioners pray that this district court is mandated pursuant to the Suplemental Rules of
32
Admiralty and the Law of Nations, Law and Justice supra, for an inquire into all the matters herein
sworn to by the Petitioners/Claimants, (husband and wife), with a report of its findings pursuant to
Libel of Review. I chartering directory companies, Sweden maritime charterers chartering directory companies, Switzerland maritime charterers chartering directory companies, Taiwan maritime charterers chartering directory companies, Thailand maritime charterers chartering directory companies, The Netherlands maritime charterers chartering directory companies, United Kingdom Mainland maritime charterers chartering directory companies, USA
Shipping News | Maritime News | Shipping Directory | Maritime Directory | Maritime Newsletter | Shipping Newsletter | www.maritime-newsletter.com | www.shipping-newsletter.com